التصنيف: أخبار

  • Trump or Harris? Election Day arrives with a stark choice

    Trump or Harris? Election Day arrives with a stark choice

    WASHINGTON (AP) — A presidential campaign marked by upheaval and rancor approached its finale on Election Day as Americans decided whether to send Donald Trump back to the White House or elevate Kamala Harris to the Oval Office.

    Polls opened across the nation Tuesday morning as voters faced a stark choice between two candidates who have offered drastically different temperaments and visions for the world’s largest economy and dominant military power.

    Harris, the Democratic vice president, stands to be the first female president if elected. She has promised to work across the aisle to tackle economic worries and other issues without radically departing from the course set by President Joe Biden. Trump, the Republican former president, has vowed to replace thousands of federal workers with loyalists, impose sweeping tariffs on allies and foes alike, and stage the largest deportation operation in U.S. history.

    The two candidates spent the waning hours of the campaign overlapping in Pennsylvania, the biggest battleground state. They were trying to energize their bases as well as Americans still on the fence or debating whether to vote at all.

    “It’s important, it’s my civic duty and it’s important that I vote for myself and I vote for the democracy and the country which I supported for 22 years of my life,” said Ron Kessler, 54, an Air Force veteran from Pennsylvania who said he was voting for just the second time.

    Harris and Trump entered Election Day focused on seven battleground states, five of them carried by Trump in 2016 before flipping to Biden in 2020: the “blue wall” of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin as well as Arizona and Georgia. Nevada and North Carolina, which Democrats and Republicans respectively carried in the last two elections, also were closely contested.

    The closeness of the race and the number of states in play raised the likelihood that once again a victor might not be known on election night. There was one early harbinger from the New Hampshire hamlet of Dixville Notch, which by tradition votes after midnight on Election Day. Dixville Notch split between Trump and Harris, with three votes for each.

    In the 2020 presidential race it took four days to declare a winner. Regardless, Trump has baselessly claimed that if he lost, it would be due to fraud. Harris’ campaign was preparing for him to try to declare victory before a winner is known on Tuesday night or to try to contest the result if she wins. Four years ago, Trump launched an effort to overturn the voters’ will that ended in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

    Trump planned to vote in his adopted home state of Florida on Tuesday, then spend the day at his Mar-a-Lago estate in advance of a party at a nearby convention center. Harris already voted by mail in her home state of California. She’ll have a watch party at her alma mater, Howard University in Washington.

    The 2024 election is here. This is what to know:

    News outlets around the world count on the AP for accurate U.S. election results. Since 1848, the AP has been calling races up and down the ballot. Support us. Donate to the AP.

    Each candidate would take the country into new terrain

    Harris, 60, would be the first woman, Black woman and person of South Asian descent to serve as president. She also would be the first sitting vice president to win the White House in 32 years.

    A victory would cap a whirlwind campaign unlike any other in American history. Harris ascended to the top of the Democratic ticket less than four months ago after Biden, facing massive pressure from his party after a disastrous debate performance, ended his reelection bid.

    Trump, 78, would be the oldest president ever elected. He would also be the first defeated president in 132 years to win another term in the White House, and the first person convicted of a felony to take over the Oval Office.

    Having left Washington abandoned by some allies after Jan. 6, Trump defeated younger rivals in the Republican primary and consolidated the support of longtime allies and harsh critics within his party. He survived one assassination attempt by millimeters at a July rally. Secret Service agents foiled a second attempt in September.

    A victory for Trump would affirm that enough voters put aside warnings from many of Trump’s former aides or instead prioritized concerns about Biden and Harris’ stewardship of the economy or the U.S.-Mexico border.

    It would all but ensure he avoids going to prison after being found guilty of his role in hiding hush-money payments to an adult film actress during his first run for president in 2016. His sentencing in that case could occur later this month. And upon taking office, Trump could end the federal investigation into his effort to overturn the 2020 election results.

    The election has huge stakes for America and the world

    The potential turbulence of a second Trump term has been magnified by his embrace of the Republican Party’s far right and his disregard for long-held democratic norms.

    Trump has used harsh rhetoric against Harris and other Democrats, calling them “demonic,” and has suggested military action against people he calls “enemies from within.”

    Harris, pointing to the warnings of Trump’s former aides, has labeled him a “fascist” and blamed Trump for putting women’s lives in danger by nominating three of the justices who overturned Roe v. Wade. In the closing hours of the campaign, she tried to strike a more positive tone and went the entire last day Monday without saying her Republican opponent’s name.

    Heading into Election Day, federal, state and local officials expressed confidence in the integrity of the nation’s election systems. They nonetheless were braced to contend with what they say is an unprecedented level of foreign disinformation — particularly from Russia and Iran — as well as the possibility of physical violence or cyberattacks.

    Both sides have armies of lawyers in anticipation of legal challenges on and after Election Day. And law enforcement agencies nationwide are on high alert for potential violence.

    The outcome of the race was being closely watched around the world, with the future of American support for Ukraine, U.S. fidelity to its global alliances and the nation’s commitment to stand up to autocrats hanging in the balance.

    Harris has vowed to continue backing Kyiv’s defense against Russia’s full-scale 2022 invasion. Trump has sharply criticized Ukraine, praised Russian President Vladimir Putin and suggested he would encourage Russia to attack NATO allies of the U.S. that Trump considers delinquent.

    Voters nationwide also were deciding thousands of other races that will decide everything from control of Congress to state ballot measures on abortion access.

    More than 82 million people voted early — shy of the record set during the 2020 pandemic, when Trump encouraged Republicans to stick to voting on Election Day. This time, he urged his voters to lock down their ballots in advance and they complied in droves.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Jill Colvin in Palm Beach, Florida, Darlene Superville and Eric Tucker in Washington, and Marc Levy in Allentown, Pennsylvania, contributed to this report.

  • When will we know the result of the US presidential election? | US elections 2024

    Over the last 25 years, Americans have regularly found themselves up into the early morning hours waiting for news organizations to make the decisive call of the last state needed to put a presidential candidate in the White House, and to learn who controls Congress.

    A moment like this on election night in 2000 led to our common language of Republican states as red states and Democratic states as blue states, as the US watched the Meet the Press host Tim Russert on NBC talk late through the night about what was happening in Florida.

    It’s extremely unlikely that we’ll know the winner of the presidential contest on election night, as Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are virtually tied in the polls, and the odds that the race comes down to a small number of swing states is high.

    So when will we know who won the US election?

    Well, that depends on how close things turn out to be. Four swing states – Arizona, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – have absentee ballot procedures that can require days to conclude. But if Harris has decisively won the other swing states, it is enough to declare her the victor. Any other result will take time.

    Why do US news organizations make the call?

    News organizations call a winner. They do not determine a winner. Officials in elections offices who count votes and certify election results determine the winner. That certification happens days or even weeks after an election.

    News organizations convey the moment it has become plain from what those elections offices have said that the mathematical results of the vote count show a winner.

    “Our standard is absolute certainty,” said David Scott, head of news strategy and operations at the Associated Press. “We don’t declare a winner until we are 100% confident that the trailing candidates can’t catch up.”

    The Guardian follows the Associated Press in calling an election.

    How do news organizations make their calls?

    The AP and other election night news organizations such as CNN, NBC, ABC and Fox News maintain a “decision desk” and use a model to project how the vote count will unfold, state by state. Some are now relying on Decision Desk HQ, an independent organization set up specifically for this task.

    “News organizations have gotten a lot more nervous about making early calls because they don’t want to have to take a call back like they did in 2000,” said Mike Whener, a professor studying elections at the University of Wisconsin.

    The decisions about when to call are made by statisticians, not news anchors.

    “It’s not Sean Hannity making that determination,” Whener said. “It’s not Rupert Murdoch making that determination early. It’s the people in the room doing the analysis, making that determination about whether, whether the election can be called.”

    The calls of different networks may differ in timing because each uses a model that is independent of others. Different analysts may make conclusions at different times.

    When did we know the results in 2020?

    Joe Biden was declared the winner on Saturday 7 November – four days after the election. The president crossed the electoral vote threshold that day when media outlets called Pennsylvania and Nevada. Michigan and Wisconsin were both called the day after the election, but Arizona wasn’t called until 12 November, North Carolina until 13 November, and Georgia on 19 November, after a recount.

    Will results be faster or slower than 2020?

    That depends on the margins in each state. According to Protect Democracy, a non-partisan group, we’ll generally see results faster than in 2020 if the margin in a state is greater than 0.5%. They draw this conclusion because there will be significantly fewer mail ballots than in 2020, and states will be able to count them faster. Three states also expanded the pre-canvassing of mail ballots before election day that didn’t in 2020 (Arizona, Georgia and Michigan) and three states have an earlier deadline for when mail ballots must arrive than they did in 2020 (North Carolina, Nevada and Pennsylvania).

    Protect Democracy said in a recent report that its best guess was that results will be called in Michigan and Wisconsin one full day after polls closed – the same speed as 2020. It also guesses that Pennsylvania will be called faster than in 2020, when it took four days; Nevada will be called in the same amount of time or faster than 2020, when it took four days and Arizona will also be called in the same amount of time or faster than 2020, when it took nine days. North Carolina and Georgia will both be called faster than 2020, the organization guesses.

    What could prolong results?

    If the margin in states is smaller than 0.5% or if any states require recounts, results could be prolonged. News outlets will generally not call states until the results of a recount.

    For Arizona and Nevada in particular, “it’s very unlikely anybody’s going to call those races on election night,” McCoy said. “That’s the way those states have worked for a very long time, and so that’s very much expected.” If another swing state is as close as Georgia was in 2020, “you’re just waiting. That’s not something you’re going to get ahead of and make a projection that’s just too close to call. And so you’re just waiting for the votes to come.”

    Pennsylvania is particularly challenging because by law, local elections offices can’t begin opening envelopes and tallying mail-in ballots until the day of the election. Wisconsin, another swing state, has a similar restriction and may not report complete results until early Wednesday morning.

    Some states permit absentee ballots to be counted as much as 10 days after election day. Of the swing states, only Nevada has a meaningful delay; it can accept mail-in ballots up to the Saturday after election day, as long as they are postmarked by 5 November.

    skip past newsletter promotion

    If there are legal battles over which ballots to count, that could also delay results. There are currently numerous pending lawsuits in a number of swing states concerning the canvassing of certain ballots, including late-arriving ballots and overseas ballots.

    If a state has results like Florida in 2000, where a three-digit number separates two candidates, the result may come down to military absentee ballots and possibly provisional ballots. Typically, only about half of provisional ballots count, but in a close race we’ll see a mad scramble by political teams to find the people who cast those ballots to “cure” them, which usually involves bringing proof of identification and registration to an elections office.

    What states will provide results first this year?

    It’s likely that news organizations will call several east coast states first where one candidate has a clear advantage over the other.

    “Obviously, there are some states that are going to be basically called at full closing,” said Drew McCoy, president of Decision Desk HQ. “There’ll be some that are called, you know, once you sort of start to see the first votes come in and that it tracks with historical precedents.”

    What is the ‘red mirage’ and the ‘blue shift’?

    The phrases “red mirage” and “blue shift” refer to the same phenomenon in which a Republican candidate appears to have a lead early in the evening, only for that edge to disappear as more votes are counted.

    In 2020, mail-in ballots heavily favored Democrats, while Republicans were far more likely to vote in-person. On Wednesday at noon on the day after the election, Donald Trump had an 11% lead, which Joe Biden overcame over the next two days as elections workers counted 2.7 million voters’ mail-in ballots. The AP and other news organizations knew how many absentee ballots voters had returned, and knew how many had been requested by registered Democrats, and refrained from calling the race for Biden until those ballots were counted.

    On the Friday before election day, Wisconsin had received more than 1m absentee ballots, with more on the way.

    “In the two most populous counties, they don’t finish counting until 1am or 2am,” Whener said. “And so several hundred thousand votes come in, you know, under the cover of darkness, and they happen in the two most liberal counties in the state. The Democrat always picks up a ton of votes in the middle of the night in Wisconsin, because, by law, they can’t start counting until then. It’s a petri dish for conspiracy theories, even though they’re doing things exactly the way they’re required to do them.”

    The opposite phenomenon occurs in Arizona, where mail-in ballots received before election day are counted – and reported – first. In 2022, the Democratic senator Mark Kelly had a 20-point lead over Republican Blake Masters at the start of the night. Kelly ultimately won with a five-point margin.

    But mail-in ballots received on election day cannot be processed until after the polls close. In 2020, that was a significant number – about 320,000 ballots in Maricopa county alone.

    Why is this so complicated? Why doesn’t the country just add up all the votes and see who has more?

    A reminder: in the presidential election contest, the popular vote nationally does not determine the result. Each state counts its votes separately. With two exceptions – Nebraska and Maine – the winner of a state gets all of its electoral votes, regardless of whether the state was won by 537 votes out of about 6m cast, as in the presidential contest in Florida in 2000, or the 1.5m-vote margin Reagan won California by in 1984.

    Each state has a number of electors based on the number of congressional districts it has, plus two additional votes representing the state’s Senate seats. Washington DC has three electoral votes, despite having no voting representation in Congress.

    It takes 270 electors to win.

    Biden won by a 51-47 percentage in 2020, a margin of about 7m votes. The electoral count was 306-232, winning about 57% of the electors.

    When will we know who controls Congress?

    Individual congressional races will be called as votes come in, but with 435 races across the country, some are bound to be too close to call on election night. Depending on how many, it may not be obvious for some time which party controls Congress, McCoy said.

    “There’s always kind of like one or two races that are just, you know, ridiculously close, and it just goes to a recount, or whatever the process may be,” McCoy said. “It’s very much about waiting for the data and seeing what it tells you, not getting in front of that. That’s our biggest rule, is never getting in front of the data.”

  • تصويت وفرز في دقائق.. هذه أولى نتائج الانتخابات الأميركية | أخبار

    تصويت وفرز في دقائق.. هذه أولى نتائج الانتخابات الأميركية | أخبار

    |

    وفقا لما تنبأت به استطلاعات الرأي، لم ينجح الناخبون الستة في قرية ديكسفيل نوتش الصغيرة في غابات ولاية نيوهامبشير عند حدود الولايات المتحدة الشمالية مع كندا، في الفصل بين المرشحين للانتخابات الرئاسية الأميركية.

    وكعادتها منذ العام 1960، بدأت في هذه القرية عند منتصف ليلة الثلاثاء عمليات الاقتراع ما يجعلها تحمل لقب “الأولى في الأمة” (First in the Nation).

    واستغرقت عمليات التصويت دقائق معدودة فقط وكذلك فرز الأصوات وإعلان النتائج، وآلت 3 أصوات للمرشحة الديمقراطية كامالا هاريس و3 أخرى لمنافسها الجمهوري دونالد ترامب.

    وتسمح القوانين الانتخابية في ولاية فيرمونت الصغيرة -الواقعة في شمال شرق البلاد للبلديات التي يقل عدد سكانها عن 100 نسمة- بفتح مراكز الاقتراع اعتبارا من منتصف الليل وإغلاقها عندما يدلي جميع المسجلين على اللوائح، بأصواتهم.

    ويبلغ عدد من يحق لهم التصويت في أميركا 230 مليون ناخب، ولكن نحو 160 مليونا منهم فقط مسجلون، ومع ذلك، تسمح نصف الولايات الـ50 تقريبا في الولايات المتحدة بالتسجيل في يوم الانتخابات، في حين يستطيع المواطنون التصويت دون تسجيل في ولاية داكوتا الشمالية.

    وقد صوت أكثر من 70 مليون شخص بالفعل من خلال صناديق الاقتراع البريدية أو في مراكز الاقتراع المبكر بهذا الاستحقاق الذي وصف بأنه الأكثر تنافسا وتشويقا في تاريخ الانتخابات الأميركية، وسط مخاوف من أعمال عنف قد تلي إعلان النتائج.

  • النائب أيمن محسب يطالب وزارة المالية بتقديم حافز للممولين الملتزمين

    النائب أيمن محسب يطالب وزارة المالية بتقديم حافز للممولين الملتزمين


    أشاد النائب الوفدى الدكتور أيمن محسب عضو مجلس النواب، بعرض وزير المالية أحمد كجوك لبيان وزارته وما تضمنه من 20 إجراء للنظام الضريبي الجديد بهدف التيسير على الشركات الصغيرة.


    وأشار فى كلمته أمام الجلسة العامة لمجلس النواب اليوم الثلاثاء خلال مناقشة مشروع قانون مقدم من الحكومة بشأن تمديد العمل بالقانون رقم 79 لسنة 2016 فى شأن إنهاء المنازعات الضريبية، أن الإصلاحات التى تعتمدها الوزارة لابد وأن يكون لها مردود سريع ومواعيد محددة.


    وأضاف محسب، المنازعات الضريبية فى ظل وزارة جديدة وتغييرات فى مصلحة الضرائب إلى التعامل بوسائل تكنولوجية حديثة تعتمد على معايير ربط ضريبى موحد، وعلى الوزير أن يتقدم بتعديل تشريعى متكامل مرة واحدة لأن التعدد حتى لو كان بالإيجاب يفقد المستهدف منه.


    وأوضح، أن الممولين مروا بظروف صعبة خلال السنوات الأخيرة بسبب ظروف عالمية وتحديات كبيرة ولابد من وضع ذلك فى عين الإعتبار، مطالبا الحكومة بدراسة تقديم حافز الملتزمين فى سداد الضريبة ولو بمنحه شهادة تقدير.

  • Control of Congress is at stake and with it a president’s agenda

    Control of Congress is at stake and with it a president’s agenda

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Control of Congress is at stake Tuesday, with ever-tight races for the House and Senate that will determine which party holds the majority and the power to boost or block a president’s agenda, or if the White House confronts a divided Capitol Hill.

    The key contests are playing out alongside the first presidential election since the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, but also in unexpected corners of the country after what has been one of the most chaotic congressional sessions in modern times.

    In the end, just a handful of seats, or as little as one, could tip the balance in either chamber.

    The economy, border security, reproductive rights and even the future of U.S. democracy itself have all punctuated the debate.

    In the Senate, where Democrats now have a slim 51-49 majority, an early boost for Republicans is expected in West Virginia. Independent Sen. Joe Manchin’s retirement creates an opening that Republican Jim Justice, now the state’s governor, is favored to win. A pickup there would deadlock the chamber, 50-50, as Republicans try to wrest control.

    Top House races are focused in New York and California, where in a politically unusual twist, Democrats are trying to claw back some of the 10 or so seats where Republicans have made surprising gains in recent years with star lawmakers who helped deliver the party to power.

    Other House races are scattered around the country in a sign of how narrow the field has become, with just a couple of dozen seats being seriously challenged, some of the most contentious in Maine, the “blue dot” around Omaha, Nebraska, and in Alaska.

    Vote counting in some races could extend well past Tuesday.

    “We’re in striking distance in terms of taking back the House,” House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who is in line to make history as the first Black speaker if his party wins control, told The Associated Press during a recent campaign swing through Southern California.

    But House Speaker Mike Johnson, drawing closer to Trump, predicts Republicans will keep “and grow” the majority. He took over after Kevin McCarthy was booted from the speaker’s office.

    Capitol Hill can make or break a new White House’s priorities, giving Trump or Harris potential allies or adversaries in the House and Senate, or a divided Congress that could force a season of compromise or stalemate.

    Congress can also play a role in upholding the American tradition of peacefully transferring presidential power. Four years ago, Trump sent his mob of supporters to “fight like hell” at the Capitol, and many Republicans in Congress voted to block Joe Biden’s election. Congress will again be called upon to certify the results of the presidential election in 2025.

    What started as a lackluster race for control of Congress was instantly transformed once Harris stepped in for Biden at the top of the ticket, energizing Democrats with massive fundraising and volunteers that lawmakers said reminded them of the Obama-era enthusiasm of the 2008 election.

    Billions of dollars have been spent by the parties, and outside groups, on the narrow battleground for both the 435-member House and 100-member Senate.

    Democrats need to win a handful of House seats to pluck party control from Republicans. In the Senate, the vice president becomes the tie-breaker in a split, which would leave control of that chamber up to the winner of the White House.

    The 2024 election is here. This is what to know:

    News outlets around the world count on the AP for accurate U.S. election results. Since 1848, the AP has been calling races up and down the ballot. Support us. Donate to the AP.

    Senate Republicans launched a wide-open map of opportunities, recruiting wealthy newcomers to put Democratic incumbents on defense in almost 10 states across the country.

    In Ohio, Trump-backed Republican Bernie Moreno, a Cleveland businessman, is seeking to unseat three-term Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown. Some $400 million has been spent on the race.

    One of the most-watched Senate races, in Montana, may be among the last to be decided. Democrat Jon Tester, a popular three-term senator and “dirt farmer” is in the fight of his political career against Trump-backed Tim Sheehy, a wealthy former NAVY Seal, who made derogatory comments about Native Americans, a key constituency in the Western state.

    And across the “blue wall” battlegrounds of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, Republicans are depending on Trump as they try to unseat a trio of incumbent Democratic senators.

    Outgoing Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell has spent a career focused on seizing and keeping majority power, but other opportunities for Republicans are slipping into long shots.

    In the Southwestern states, Arizona firebrand Republican Kari Lake has struggled against Democrat Ruben Gallego in the seat opened by Sen. Krysten Sinema’s retirement. In Nevada, Democratic Sen. Jacky Rosen has been holding out against newcomer Sam Brown.

    Democrats intensified their challenges to a pair of Republican senators — Ted Cruz of Texas and Rick Scott in Florida — in states where reproductive rights have been a focus in the aftermath of the Supreme Court decision rolling back abortion access. Cruz faces Democrat Colin Allred, the Dallas-area congressman, while Scott has poured $10 millions of his own fortune into the race against Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, a former House lawmaker.

    Congress has a chance to reach several history-making milestones as it is reshaped by the American electorate and becomes more representative of a diverse nation.

    Not one, but possibly two Black women could be on their way to the Senate, which would be something never seen in the U.S.

    Democrat Lisa Blunt Rochester of Delaware is favored in the Senate race against Republican Eric Hansen.

    And in Maryland, Harris-ally Angela Alsobrooks is in a highly competitive race against the state’s popular former governor, Republican Larry Hogan.

    Americans have elected two Black women, including Harris, as senators since the nation’s founding, but never at the same time.

    House candidate Sarah McBride, a state lawmaker from Delaware who is close to the Biden family, is poised to become the first openly transgender person in Congress.

    Fallout from redistricting, when states redraw their maps for congressional districts, is also shifting the balance of power within the House — with Republicans set to gain several seats from Democrats in North Carolina and Democrats picking up a second Black-majority seat in Republican-heavy Alabama.

    Lawmakers in the House face voters every two years, while senators serve longer six-year terms.

    If the two chambers do in fact flip party control, as is possible, it would be rare.

    Records show that if Democrats take the House and Republicans take the Senate, it would be the first time that the chambers of Congress have both flipped to opposing political parties.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Stephen Groves, Kevin Freking and Farnoush Amiri contributed to this report.

  • Trump staffer fired from Republican party for being a white supremacist | US elections 2024

    A Donald Trump staffer who worked as a regional field director for the western Pennsylvania Republican party was fired on Friday after it was revealed that he was a white supremacist.

    Politico reported it had identified Luke Meyer, 24, a Pennsylvania-based field staffer who worked for five months for the former president, as the online white nationalist who used the pseudonym Alberto Barbarossa.

    Meyer reportedly co-hosts the Alexandria podcast with Richard Spencer, the organiser of the 2017 white nationalist Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia and regularly shared racist views.

    “Why can’t we make New York, for example, white again? Why can’t we clear out and reclaim Miami?” Barbarossa asked during a podcast recording in June.

    “I’m not saying we need to be 100% homogeneous. I’m not saying we need to be North Korea or Japan or anything like that. A return to 80%, 90% white would probably be, probably the best we could hope for, to some degree.”

    After being presented with evidence by Politico linking him to the Barbarossa alias, Meyer admitted the connection and confessed that he had been concealing his online identity from fellow members of Trump Force 47, the arm of the Trump campaign overseeing volunteer mobilisation efforts.

    “I am glad you pieced these little clues together like an antifa Nancy Drew,” Meyer wrote in an email to Politico. “It made me realise how draining it has been having to conceal my true thoughts for as long as I have.”

    Meyer was hired in June by the Pennsylvania Republican party, which fired him on Friday, in a move confirmed in a text message by the GOP to the Washington Post.

    In an email to Politico, Meyer said: “Like the hydra, you can cut off my head and hold it up for the world to see, but two more will quietly appear and be working in the shadows. Slating Trump to speak at [Madison Square Garden], putting ‘poisoning the blood’ in his speeches, setting up Odal runes at CPAC, etc. In a few years, one of those groypers [slang for white supremacists] might even quietly bring me back in, with a stern warning for me to ‘be more careful next time’.”

    Neo-Nazi groups and the online far right are latching on to the anti-immigration rhetoric used by Trump’s campaign for the White House in an effort to recruit new supporters and spread their extremism to broader audiences.

  • هاريس دعمت الإبادة وترامب تفوح منه رائحة صفقة القرن الجديدة | سياسة

    هاريس دعمت الإبادة وترامب تفوح منه رائحة صفقة القرن الجديدة | سياسة

    لن أجازف بإطلاق “التنبُّؤات” حول أي من المترشحَين المتصارعين على البيت الأبيض ستكون له الغلبة في سباق الخامس من نوفمبر/ تشرين الثاني، تلك مجازفة تزداد صعوبة كلما ازدادت أرقام الاستطلاعات تقاربًا، ليبدو معها أن المتسابقين يقطعان الطريق إلى “المكتب البيضاوي” كتفًا إلى كتف.

    ما يهمّنا في هذا المقام، والانتخابات على مبعدة ساعات، أن نستقرئ ما يمكن أن يترتب على فوز أي من كامالا هاريس، أو دونالد ترامب، على حروب المنطقة وأزماتها المفتوحة.. هل ثمّة فوارق جوهرية في مواقف الحزبين من قضايا الإقليم الملتهب، تستدعي الاهتمام، وما هو السيناريو الأكثر خطورة على الفلسطينيين في غزة، بل وعلى القضية الفلسطينية ومستقبل المشروع الوطني الفلسطيني؟

    على الرغم من أن “سؤال الفوارق” فقد كثيرًا من قيمته السياسية، في ضوء الأداء المنافق والمراوغ لإدارة بايدن/ هاريس خلال السنوات الأربع الفائتة، وتحديدًا في “عام الطوفان” وما بعده، وإحجام الإدارة عن “تصحيح” أخطاء ترامب وخطاياه بحق الفلسطينيين والعرب من جهة، وانحيازها البالغ حد الشراكة في جرائم الحرب التي ارتكبتها حكومة اليمين الفاشي في إسرائيل من جهة أخرى.. نقول، على الرغم من كل هذا، فإن السؤال ما زال قائمًا، وذا قيمة سياسية، يتعين التحسب لها، وأخذها بعين الاعتبار.

    ترامب إن عاد!

    لسنا أمام مرشح جديد، ليتعين علينا الانتظار للتعرف على خياراته وتوجهاته، فالرجل تسيّد البيت الأبيض لسنوات أربع، وهو بطبعه كثير الكلام، يخرج ما في جوفه على لسانه، وهو تبسيطي حد الاعتقاد بأن لديه حلولًا سحرية وفورية لأكثر مشاكل الكون تعقيدًا.

    لقد منح إسرائيل في ولايته الأولى جملة من الجوائز الكبرى: اعترف بـ”القدس الموحدة” عاصمة لإسرائيل، ونقل سفارة بلاده من تل أبيب إليها، صادق على ضم هضبة الجولان السورية المحتلة للسيادة الإسرائيلية، وأطلق مشروعًا حمل اسمه للحل النهائي للصراع الفلسطيني، والذي عرف على نطاق واسع باسم “صفقة القرن”، والتي منح من خلالها حكومة نتنياهو ما يقرب من ثلث مساحة الضفة الغربية.

    ناهيكم بالطبع عن إغلاق مكتب منظمة التحرير في واشنطن، والقنصلية الأميركية في القدس الشرقية، بعد قرن ونصف القرن على افتتاحها، إلى جانب الحملة “المكارثيّة” الشعواء ضد منظمات الأمم المتحدة، وبشكل خاص “الأونروا” ومنظمات حقوق الإنسان.

    يمكن القول من دون مجازفة بأن ترامب أطاح بالنموذج “Paradigm”، الذي انتظم مواقف وسياسات إدارات أميركية متعاقبة؛ جمهورية وديمقراطية، من القضية الفلسطينية، ووضع لنفسه نموذجًا مغايرًا.. أطاح بالإطار الإقليمي التقليدي المحيط بها، وتحديدًا الدورين الأردني والمصري، واستبدله بإطار إقليمي آخر، يكاد ينحصر في الدورين السعودي والإماراتي، الأمر الذي نُظِرَ إليه من عمان على أقل تقدير، بوصفه تهميشًا للدور الأردني في واحدٍ من أهم مجالاته الحيوية.

    وارتأت بسببه نخب سياسية أردنية أن واشنطن تحت قيادة ترامب لا تتهدد أعمق المصالح والحقوق الوطنية المشروعة للشعب الفلسطيني فحسب، بل وباتت تبدي “تسامحًا” أكبر حيال التضحية بمصالح الأردن وحساباته وحساسياته، في إطار مشروعه للحل النهائي لقضية فلسطين.

    وثمة سؤال يهيمن على الأوساط السياسية والدبلوماسية والإعلامية: ما الذي يمكن لترامب أن يقدمه لإسرائيل في ولايته الثانية؟ لا سيما بعد تعليق مثير للقلق صدر عنه قبل بضعة أسابيع، حين رأى إسرائيل “صغيرة جدًا” على خريطة العالم، وأن الوقت قد حان للتفكير بتوسعتها.

    حزم وسخاء

    أحسب أن ترامب سيكون أكثر حزمًا وحسمًا لجهة وقف الحرب، وفي أسرع وقت ممكن، فتلك هي شخصيته، وتلك هي طريقته في التعامل مع الأزمات واللاعبين والقادة، الخصوم والحلفاء على حد سواء.

    لكن الرجل سيكون أكثر “سخاءً” في منح مزيدٍ من جوائز الترضية لحكومة نتنياهو واليمين الأكثر تطرفًا. إن لم يكن نظير المسارعة إلى وقف الحرب، فمن باب التعبير عن وحدة الحال بين اليمين الأميركي الذي يمثله وتجسده إدارته، واليمين الفاشي المتفشي على خريطة الحكومة والمعارضة في تل أبيب.

    أحسب أيضًا أن ترامب سيغرف من كيس الضفة الغربية أساسًا لتلبية الشهية التوسعية لليمين الديني والقومي في إسرائيل، ولا أستبعد أن يمنح حكومة نتنياهو ضوءًا أخضر لضم المنطقة (ج) من الضفة الغربية بأكملها، وحشر سكانها في منطقتي (أ و ب)، وفي إطار “صفقة القرن 2″، حتى وإن أدى ذلك إلى دفن أي فرصة لقيام كيان فلسطيني قابل للحياة، ولا أتحدث هنا عن دولة فلسطينية مستقلة.

    سيناريوهات جديدة

    والأرجح أن “صفقة القرن 2” ستعيد الاعتبار للدورين الأردني والمصري، بخلاف حالة التجاهل والتهميش التي تعرض لها هذان الدوران في “صفقة القرن 1″، ولكن من بوابة مختلفة هذه المرة.. بوابة تلقي مخرجات “الحل النهائي”، الإسرائيلي – الأميركي للقضية الفلسطينية.

    فالأردن، في تصور ترامب، قد يكون “طوق النجاة” للكيان الفلسطيني المُقام على “بقايا الضفة الغربية”، من ضمن صيغة فدرالية أو كونفدرالية، ومصر ستظل بوابة الحل الإسرائيلي لغزة، حال نجحت إعادة هندسة القطاع.. ودائمًا لمساعدة إسرائيل في التخلص من “فائض الديمغرافيا” الفلسطينية.

    سيكون ممكنًا الادعاء بأن دولة فلسطينية قد قامت على التراب الوطني أو ما تبقى منه، وأنها ككيان “سيّد” و”مستقل” قد قررت الدخول في نوع من “الوحدة أو الاتحاد” مع الأردن الشقيق. والأرجح أن مشروعًا كهذا سيجد دعمًا من أوساط عربية عدة، بل وقد تُسارع دول مقتدرة على رفده بالمال والإعمار، ليكون “سنغافورة” الشرق الأوسط، والتعبير هنا لدونالد ترامب ذات “دردشة” حول مستقبل قطاع غزة.

    خريطة اللاعبين

    المرحبون بعودة ترامب في الإقليم والعالم، لن يجعلوا من “صفقة القرن 2” سببًا لتعكير صفو العلاقة مع إدارة جمهورية في ظاهرها، “ترامبية” في جوهرها. والترامبية هي التعبير الشعبوي الأكثر ابتذالًا لتيارات اليمين المتطرف الصاعد في الغرب، يشمل ذلك دولًا عربية عدة، مثلما يشمل لاعبين دوليين كالاتحاد الروسي، الذي يعطي أولوية مطلقة للخروج من “مستنقع أوكرانيا” ووقف الحرب على ساحتها.

    وهو نظير ذلك قد يذهب لتسويات و”مقايضات” بعيدة المدى، من ضمنها تسهيل مهمة ترامب في بعض ملفات الشرق الأوسط الأكثر تعقيدًا… تطور كهذا (عودة ترامب) قد يكون مقلقًا للاتحاد الأوروبي ودوله الفاعلة، بما يستبطنه من تداعيات على العلاقة بين ضفتي الأطلسي، ومستقبل “الناتو”، والانقسامات حول عدد من العناوين الرئيسة التي تتصدر الأجندة العالمية، مثل قضية التغير المناخي على سبيل المثال، لا الحصر.

    السيئ والأسوأ

    في المفاضلة ما بين خيارين، أحلاهما مُرّ، أو بين السيئ والأسوأ، تبدو كامالا هاريس خيارًا مفضلًا لدى العديد من الأوساط الفلسطينية والعربية (السلطة، الأردن، مصر، وغيرها)، كما أنها الخيار الأنسب لأطراف إقليمية مثل إيران، إذ تقدم الدبلوماسية على “قرع طبول الحرب” في كل ما يتعلق ببرنامج إيران النووي.

    فيما ستستقبل موسكو بقلق بالغ تطورًا كهذا، فالرئيسة هاريس، امتدادًا لإدارة أوباما، ستواصل حشد التأييد لأوكرانيا، لإلحاق الهزيمة بروسيا، واستتباعًا بالصين، التهديد الأكبر للنفوذ المهيمن للولايات المتحدة، على الاقتصاد والنظام الدوليين.

    إستراتيجيات مستقبلية

    تتقلص الخيارات وهوامش المناورة أمام الفلسطينيين، وهم يفاضلون بين خيارين أحلاهما مُرّ، بين إدارة مرتحلة قدمت لإسرائيل في عشرة أشهر من الحرب ما تحصل عليه من إدارات ديمقراطية وجمهورية في عشر سنوات، وإدارة أخرى تفوح منها رائحة صفقة القرن القديمة وأخرى جديدة، تنذران بتجريدهم من أرضهم وحقوقهم ومقدساتهم.. الأمر الذي يُملي عليهم تطوير إستراتيجية وطنية جديدة تنفض عن نفسها أوهام الحلول السياسية القريبة، وتؤسس لإدامة هذا الصراع، ربما لعقود وأجيال قادمة.

    إستراتيجية تبني على ما تحقق من تعزيز لمكانة فلسطين على جدول أعمال العالم، بفعل “الطوفان”.. إستراتيجية تلحظ تعزيز عرى التحالف مع دول وحركات شبابية وشعبية عالمية تحررت من “السردية الإسرائيلية”.

    إستراتيجية تبدأ بترتيب البيت الفلسطيني، بعيدًا عن المشاريع الهزيلة لحوار ومصالحة لم تفضِ إلى أية نتيجة ملموسة. إستراتيجية محورها “الصمود والمقاومة”، وتعزيز جهاز المناعة المكتسبة للمجتمع الفلسطيني الرازح تحت احتلالات متعاقبة، قديمة وجديدة، من قبل العدو ذاته.. إستراتيجية تعيد بعث

    وتجديد الحركة الوطنية الفلسطينية واسترداد منظمة التحرير.

    إستراتيجية تعيد الاعتبار لدور الشعوب العربية في الدعم والإسناد ومقاومة التطبيع وتعزيز المقاطعة، باعتبارها معركة دفاع هذه الشعوب عن مستقبلها وحريتها وكرامتها، وليست تعبيرًا موسميًا عن التضامن مع شعب عربي شقيق يرزح تحت نير احتلال عنصري استئصالي، لا يتورع عن شنّ حروب التطويق والتطهير والإبادة ضد شعوبنا العربية، كما حصل ويحصل في غزة والضفة ولبنان.

    إستراتيجية تنتقل بكفاح شعب فلسطين من أجل الحرية والاستقلال من الاعتمادية على الغير إلى الاعتماد على الذات والأصدقاء المخلصين.

    الآراء الواردة في المقال لا تعكس بالضرورة الموقف التحريري لشبكة الجزيرة.