الوسم: California

  • In Harris’s home of California, voters weigh economy, reproductive rights | US Election 2024 News

    In Harris’s home of California, voters weigh economy, reproductive rights | US Election 2024 News

    San Francisco, California – Under a gold-leaf dome in downtown San Francisco, the usual procession of wedding parties tiptoed out of City Hall with freshly minted marriage licences.

    But there was a rival line stretching down the steps for a different reason: Californians had arrived in droves to participate in the pivotal 2024 United States election.

    This year’s presidential race was rich with symbolism for the San Francisco Bay Area. One of the two major candidates, Democrat and Vice President Kamala Harris, considers the Bay Area home.

    She was born in nearby Oakland. Raised in neighbouring Berkeley. And in San Francisco, she built a reputation as a prosecutor that saw her rocket up the political ladder.

    First, she was elected the city’s district attorney, serving in City Hall from 2002 to 2011, steps away from the law school where she received her degree.

    Later, she became the state’s attorney general and then its senator in the US Congress.

    California is known as a Democratic stronghold, part of the “blue wall” of states that consistently vote for the party.

    And as the most populous state in the country, California boasts a whopping 54 Electoral College votes. Al Jazeera spoke to voters outside City Hall on Tuesday to understand what was motivating their votes this election cycle.

    A supporter of London Breed, holding signs for her reelection campaign
    Anjali Rimi campaigned on election day to support incumbent Mayor London Breed [Allison Griner/Al Jazeera]

    Anjali Rimi, social service worker

    Standing in the shadow of City Hall’s towering 94-metre (307-foot) dome, Anjali Rimi was hoping to encourage other voters to re-elect Democratic Mayor London Breed to a second term in office.

    But the wider general election likewise weighed heavily on Rimi’s mind.

    “At all levels — federal, state and the city of San Francisco — what’s at stake is democracy,” Rimi told Al Jazeera.

    “What’s at stake is the lives of immigrants. What’s at stake is the lives of minority-religion people, like myself, or many of my Muslim, Sikh, non-white, non-male, non-Christian folks who need to be protected in this country.

    “What’s at stake is the fundamental rights of every human being in this world that sometimes we tend to not see right here in the United States of America. And hence, this election is historic on so many fronts.”

    Rimi’s words echoed critics’ concerns about Donald Trump, the Republican presidential candidate and former president known for nativist rhetoric.

    When asked why certain voters in the US do not see those fundamental rights, Rimi was unequivocal.

    “You have to give and attribute a lot of that to white supremacy. It may not look white always, but privilege and those that have a position continue to want to conquer and lead and brutalise this world, Rimi said.

    “Hence, we don’t see the struggles of those that are at the margins — the many of us who have come to this country to make it our home and are just trying to live a happy and peaceful life with our families but still have a connection back to our homelands.”

    She added that she hoped to “protect Black and woman leadership” this election cycle.

    A woman points to her shirt in front of San Francisco City Hall. It reads: We are not going back
    Melanie Mathewson wears a T-shirt that reads, ‘We are not going back’ [Allison Griner/Al Jazeera]

    Melanie Mathewson, 26, political consultant

    The decision to end the Supreme Court precedent Roe v Wade in 2022 was a prominent theme in this year’s presidential race.

    On one hand, former President Trump campaigned on how his decisions while in office helped pave the way for the repeal of federal protections for abortion care.

    “For 54 years, they were trying to get Roe v Wade terminated. And I did it,” he said in January.

    By contrast, Harris has campaigned on restoring access to reproductive healthcare. “When Congress passes a bill to restore reproductive freedom nationwide, as president of the United States, I will proudly sign it into law,” she told a campaign rally earlier this year.

    That debate helped inspire Melanie Mathewson’s vote in the general election.

    “What’s driving me on a federal level is women’s rights,” she said. “I would love to have children one day, and I want to make sure, no matter where I live or where they choose to live, they have access to whatever healthcare that they need for their bodies.”

    She also gave a nod to the anti-transgender, anti-immigrant and anti-LGBTQ rhetoric that has become a frequent topic in the Trump campaign.

    “Whether I have children who are transgender or I have children who are gay, I want them to feel comfortable and protected no matter where they live in this country, not just in California,” Mathewson said.

    “I’m also very concerned about my Black and Brown friends and my friends who have immigrant parents who are not citizens, who are just trying to make their way.”

    Christian nationalism, she added, was helping to shape many of Trump’s policies.

    “With the possibility of Christian nationalism becoming the way that we rule our country if Trump wins, I’m afraid that there is not going to be freedom of religion, freedom over our bodies,” she said.

    Two voters hold picket signs in front of San Francisco City Hall
    Matt Fitzgerald and Maddie Dunn advocated for small businesses on Election Day [Allison Griner/Al Jazeera]

    Maddie Dunn, 23, and Matt Fitzgerald, 28, campaigners

    The shuttered storefronts that line downtown San Francisco were top of mind for Maddie Dunn and Matt Fitzgerald, who hoped Election Day would bring good news for small businesses.

    They hoped that ballot initiatives in San Francisco would result in lower taxes and permitting fees for local companies.

    The city’s population plummeted by nearly 65,000 residents during the COVID-19 pandemic, and businesses took a punch as a result.

    “San Francisco’s had the slowest COVID recovery in North America,” Fitzgerald said. “We’ve got a lot of problems here in our downtown, with empty office spaces, closing small businesses and things like that.”

    Dunn explained that her father was a small business owner, and the downturn left her worried.

    “This is an issue that you can really see day to day: How well is your corner store doing? Or your coffee shop? And in San Francisco, the answer is that businesses are recovering, but they’re still struggling from decreased foot traffic, really slow margins,” she said.

    Both she and Fitzgerald, however, indicated that they would throw their support behind Harris, who has promised to boost start-ups, despite scepticism from the right.

    “She understands how important small businesses are to our communities. And with her economic plan, when it comes down to it, she has the approval of experts,” Dunn said.

    Fitzgerald, for his part, warned that Trump represented a threat to US democracy, pointing to his actions on January 6, 2021, when his supporters stormed the US Capitol.

    “I think the candidates could not be more different,” he said. “I mean, you have one candidate, our former president, who literally tried to overthrow our democracy on January 6th, and you have a candidate who is pro-democracy, who is pro-women’s rights and is pro-LGBTQ rights.”

    This election, he added, will be “a huge fork in the road”.

    A woman holds up copies of the Pissed Off Voter Guide in front of San Francisco City Hall
    Jennifer Fieber held up copies of the ‘Pissed Off Voter Guide’ on Election Day [Allison Griner/Al Jazeera]

    Jennifer Fieber, 51, member of San Francisco Tenants Union

    For decades, the San Francisco Bay Area has been in the grips of a housing crisis.

    Housing prices are unaffordable for many residents. Rental costs have ticked up. And a January 2024 report from the city government estimated that homelessness affects at least 8,323 residents — a likely undercount. More than 20,000 sought assistance for homelessness over the course of a year.

    Jennifer Fieber, a member of the San Francisco Tenants Union, pointed to the crisis as the main motivation for her vote. She indicated that she would be supporting progressive candidate Aaron Peskin in his race for mayor.

    “Tenants are 64 percent of the city,” Fieber said. “I think if you stabilise their housing, it has a profound effect on the working class and the ability of people to live in the city. So we need candidates that are gonna protect tenants.”

    She explained that high housing prices were forcing essential workers like nurses and teachers out of the city.

    When asked which candidates had put forward platforms to address the issue, Fieber responded: “Actually, I think that they have been ignoring it to their detriment.”

    That includes on the national scale, she added. “I support the Democrats, but they don’t really have a housing policy.”

    A voter holds up a sign in San Francisco that says, "Yes on K"
    Joshua Kelly hopes to ensure a local highway remains closed as the effects of climate change become more apparent [Allison Griner/Al Jazeera]

    Joshua Kelly, 45, stay-at-home dad

    For homemaker and stay-at-home dad Joshua Kelly, the roadway that lines San Francisco’s Pacific Coast was a motivation to get out the vote.

    That four-lane road, known as the Great Highway, was closed during the COVID-19 pandemic, to allow for outdoor recreation. Residents like Kelly hope it remains closed, particularly as the highway faces the ravages of climate change.

    “Our plan [is] to turn a coastal highway that’s falling into the ocean into a park and promenade for the whole city,” Kelly said.

    He argued that the stakes are bigger than just the fate of a road.

    “What kind of a city do we want to be? Do we want to be a city that acknowledges and embraces climate change and plans for it?” Kelly asked. “Or do we want to be a city that prioritises polluting, climate-change-causing car travel and the convenience of that above everything else?”

    He credited outgoing President Joe Biden with taking some steps to address the climate crisis.

    “Joe Biden was able to, through the Inflation Reduction Act, create one of the biggest pieces of climate legislation. And we’re seeing a lot of renewable energy come out of that,” Kelly explained.

    But he warned that continued activism would be necessary to keep the issue at the forefront of national policy, no matter the outcome on Tuesday.

    “I think we’re part of a coalition that’s going to put pressure on Kamala Harris to do that if she is elected as well. And if Trump gets in, he’s going to push fossil fuels. He’s going to end subsidies for renewable energy. He’s going to send us backwards.”

    Kelly also feared the violence Trump might spark if he refuses to accept a defeat at Harris’s hands.

    “I am concerned about the potential for violence,” Kelly said. “If the election becomes sort of contested, there is a good chance that the House of Representatives and the Supreme Court would conspire to give the election to Trump, despite him losing the votes in the Electoral College.”

    A voter puts a mail-in ballot in a drop box in San Francisco
    Voters cast their ballots outside San Francisco’s City Hall on November 5 [Allison Griner/Al Jazeera]
  • US family reaches settlement after child’s goat was seized and slaughtered | California

    The family of a child whose pet goat was seized and then slaughtered due to the technicalities of a county fair has received a $300,000 settlement from a California county.

    Jessica Long sued Shasta county after sheriff’s deputies there seized her daughter’s goat, Cedar, for slaughter. The recent six-figure settlement to which Long’s family and the county agreed resolved the legal differences between them, though the litigation is still pending against other defendants.

    The Long family’s ordeal began in June 2022 at the Shasta county fair. Long and her relatives put Cedar up for auction. But Long’s daughter – now nine – had a change of heart and realized she couldn’t part with her beloved goat and friend.

    Long withdrew Cedar, then seven months old, from auction before bidding began – and offered in writing to compensate the goat’s buyer.

    Shasta fair officials refused the withdrawal request, citing fair rules – and Cedar was sold for $902.

    Long took matters into her own hands and took Cedar to a farm in Sonoma county, California – more than 200 miles (322km) away. But fair officials persisted, calling Long demanding that she return the goat.

    The lawsuit asserts that after coming across an Instagram post galvanizing support to save the goat, a sheriff’s detective applied for a warrant to search a Napa county farm at the direction of his boss. A magistrate approved the warrant, Long’s lawsuit says.

    But Cedar was nowhere to be found. The detective then allegedly travelled to other farms, for which he did not have search warrants.

    Cedar was turned over “to third parties whom they deemed to be his rightful owner outside of any lawful judicial process” and eventually slaughtered. Long and her family, meanwhile, were out of town when the goat was killed.

    Long filed the federal lawsuit in the eastern district of California against the county and the sheriff’s office employees, alleging they violated her and her daughter’s right to due process as well as their right against unreasonable search and seizure.

    “As a result, the young girl who raised Cedar lost him, and Cedar lost his life,” the lawsuit said. “Now plaintiffs can never get him back.”

    “Unfortunately, this litigation cannot bring Cedar home. But the $300,000 settlement with the county of Shasta and Shasta county sheriff’s office is the first step in moving forward,” attorney Vanessa Shakib, co-director of Advancing Law for Animals, said in an Instagram post.

    Shakib said Long was still pursuing litigation against the fair organizers, employees and a volunteer.

    The California department of food and agriculture, which oversees the fair, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

  • Five closest US elections: When California, New York were swing states | US Election 2024 News

    Five closest US elections: When California, New York were swing states | US Election 2024 News

    Voters across 50 states in the US are casting ballots to choose the 47th president of the country in an election that has turned into a neck-and-neck battle between the two main candidates.

    So far, election analysts say this year’s presidential race between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump is too close to call.

    According to FiveThirtyEight’s daily polls tracker, Harris has a 1.2-point lead over Trump nationally. But Trump has begun narrowing the gap in recent days, and has slim leads in the battleground states of North Carolina, Georgia and Arizona.

    Yet it’s not the first time that the path to the United States presidency has essentially seen a dead heat between candidates. Previous closely fought presidential elections have also seen California and New York – not the typical swing states – and also the US Supreme Court play a role in deciding the winner.

    Let’s take a look at five presidential races in US history that came down to a few thousand votes:

    1824: US House of Representatives weighs in

    The 1824 battle for the White House was a turning point in American history as four candidates, all from the same political party, competed for the top post and the US House of Representatives had to pick the winner.

    After the death of Alexander Hamilton, America’s first US secretary of the treasury and a founding father in 1804, the Democratic-Republic Party which had defeated Hamilton’s Federalist Party, was confident of its easy path to presidency.

    But picking one presidential candidate proved to be hard for members of the party, and John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, Andrew Jackson and William H Crawford, all from the Democratic-Republic Party, campaigned across the country, hoping to become the next president.

    When polls closed across all 28 US states (the country now has 50), Jackson was in the lead with 99 electoral votes, followed by Adams who received 84, Crawford who got 41 and Clay who got 37 electoral votes.

    But no candidate received a majority.

    According to the Twelfth Amendment of the US Constitution, in such a case, “the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President”. Moreover, since the Constitution also stated that only the top three in the race move ahead, Clay was disqualified.

    For around a year, each candidate lobbied members of the House of Representatives – the lower chamber of the US Congress, including Clay, who was the speaker of the House.

    Finally, on February 9, 1825, the House voted to elect Adams as the president of the US, a result that came to form after a critical vote by Clay. According to the US National Archives, he shelved his support for his home state candidate Jefferson, and picked Adams.

    Adams, who was also the son of John Adams, the second president of the US, eventually picked Clay as his secretary of state.

    This did not go down well with Jackson, and he accused Clay and Adams of engaging in a “corrupt bargain” and sought an election rematch.

    During the next presidential election in 1828, Jackson managed to beat Adams and became the president. But his anger towards Clay remained.

    According to a US Senate Historical Highlight brief, towards the end of his presidency, when Jackson was asked if he had any regrets, he said: “I regret I was unable to shoot Henry Clay…”

    1876: One vote changed the game

    Half a century later, the presidential election was decided by one vote in the Electoral Commission – a group created by the US Congress comprising 14 congressmen and a Supreme Court justice, to solve the disputed presidential race.

    The 1876 election saw Republican Party candidate Rutherford B Hayes, who had also fought in the US Civil War, up against Democratic Party candidate Samuel Tilden, a politician known for his anti-corruption policies. Moreover, this being an era when the US was just recovering from the 18th-century Civil War and Congress had passed several Reconstruction Acts, one of the goals was ensuring that the voting rights of Black Americans were secure.

    But in many southern states like Louisiana, white Americans wanted a return to white supremacy and had been protesting against efforts to enfranchise Black people in the country since 1873. Describing the situation in the south, in his essay Black Reconstruction: An Essay Toward a History of the Part Black Folk Played in the Attempt to Reconstruct Democracy in America, 1860-1880, historian WEB Du Bois wrote: “The slave went free; stood a brief moment in the sun; then moved back again toward slavery.”

    By the 1876 presidential election, the Black vote had almost been repressed and this led to the Democratic Party becoming popular among Black voters in the South, especially in Louisiana, South Carolina, and Florida.

    According to White House archives, “The popular vote apparently was 4,300,000 for Tilden to 4,036,000 for Hayes”. However, Hayes’s chances of election depended upon contested electoral votes in Louisiana, South Carolina and Florida. So the Republicans demanded a recount.

    After months of uncertainty, in 1877, Congress weighed in and formed the Electoral Commission, which voted in favour of Hayes. After the commission’s vote, Hayes defeated Tilden by one vote: 185 electoral votes to 184.

    On winning the elections, Hayes pledged to protect Black Americans’ rights in the South and also encouraged the “restoration of wise, honest, and peaceful local self-government”.

    1884: When New York was a swing state

    New York has been a stronghold for the Democratic Party in more recent years. But in 1884, the state was a swing state and played a critical role in deciding the winner of the presidential race, which was also marred by a scandal.

    Republican candidate James G Blaine was up against the Democratic Party’s Grover Cleveland, who was also the mayor of New York.

    Back then, the US was rife with economic drama and filled with corrupt money-making deals. The Democratic Party was popular in the southern states in the US and Cleveland had impressed people in New York with his anti-corruption policies. He and the Democratic Party believed they had an easy path to success.

    But just days after Cleveland was nominated as the presidential candidate of the Democratic Party on July 11, the Buffalo Evening Telegraph reported that he had fathered a son with a woman named Maria Halpin. According to the US Library of Congress, the child had been given away to an orphanage since Cleveland was not certain the child was his. But he helped the child financially until he was adopted.

    The Republican Party latched on to this story as its candidate, Blaine, had been painted by the Democratic Party campaign as a liar and politician involved in cash deals.

    In turn, according to the Library of Congress, a popular satirical publication called The Judge ran a cartoon of Cleveland titled: “Ma, Ma, Where’s my Pa?”

    While Cleveland was running on the slogan, “Tell the truth”, the scandal dented his support base in New York, the most populous state carrying 36 electoral votes back then.

    When polls closed, Cleveland’s lead was narrow in the state and he received 563,048 votes in New York to Blaine’s 562,001.

    In the end, the few thousand votes decided by New York together with the combined support of reform Republicans who disliked Blaine helped Cleveland win.

    According to White House archives, President Cleveland pursued a policy of not offering favours to any economic groups. He was also said not to particularly enjoy the comforts of the White House.

    As president, he once wrote to a friend: “I must go to dinner…but I wish it was to eat a pickled herring, a Swiss cheese and a chop at Louis’ instead of the French stuff I shall find.”

    1916: California calls the shots

    In 1916, a drink in Long Beach, California was what it took to upend the US presidential race between Woodrow Wilson, from the Democratic Party, and Republican candidate Charles Evans Hughes.

    Back then, the western US state known for its picturesque beaches and redwood forests had 13 electoral votes and was a swing state. Currently, being the most populous state, it has 54 electoral votes – the most in the US.

    Moreover, besides presidential candidates, two members of California’s Republican Party – Hiram Johnson and conservative William Booth – hoped to win seats in the US Senate.

    According to the History Channel, while campaigning in Long Beach, Hughes was told that Johnson was staying in the same hotel as him but did not engage with Johnson or offer him a drink.

    Johnson wasn’t very pleased and did not offer his support to Hughes in California, meaning Wilson won the swing state by around 3,000 votes. Wilson also won the presidency.

    2000: US Supreme Court decides

    The presidential race of 2000 saw Democrat Al Gore, the vice president of the country back then, and Republican George W Bush, who was the governor of Texas, compete. The contest ultimately came down to Florida — and the US Supreme Court had to weigh in.

    On election night, as polls closed across the country, it became clear the 25 electoral votes in Florida, a swing state, would determine the winner. When results from the Sunshine State trickled in, TV networks across the US began announcing that Bush had won the state’s electoral votes. Gore called Bush to congratulate him, but soon withdrew his concession when Bush’s lead in Florida began dropping.

    Lawyers from the Democratic Party and Republican Party began a legal fight over the votes, with Gore’s lawyers also demanding a recount.

    The battle went to the country’s Supreme Court and, after weeks of uncertainty, the court said the recounts could not be established and voted 5-4 in favour of Bush’s victory.

    The Bush versus Gore election continues to haunt the country’s court, which has often stayed away from elections.

    In 2013, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who voted with the majority in the Supreme Court, told the Chicago Tribune that the “court took the case and decided it at a time when it was still a big election issue. … Maybe the court should have said, ‘We’re not going to take it, goodbye’.”